Corporate social performance in international business.

We examine the 2022 JIBS Decade Award article by Ioannou and Serafeim (J Int Bus Stud 43(9):834-864, 2012) and review the literature since 2012 to clarify research developments in corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance (CSP) in the multinational enterprise, articulating key themes, findings and antecedents. We present a general framework that highlights unique traits and processes of CSP for MNEs. To advance scholarly progress, we delineate how new theoretical perspectives, such as organizational identity and strategic choice, can be blended with the IB literature to deepen theorization of the topic. We also discuss how new global dynamics, such as geopolitics, digitization, and activism, may shape CSP strategies and activities for MNEs and how future research can tackle these issues.

Nous examinons l'article d'Ioannou et Serafeim (2012) ­ lauréat du 2022 JIBS Decade Award ­ et passons en revue la littérature depuis 2012 afin de clarifier les développements de la recherche sur la responsabilité sociale des entreprises (Corporate Social Responsibility ­ CSR) et la performance sociale des entreprises (Corporate Social Performance ­ CSP) dans l'entreprise multinationale, et ce en articulant les thèmes clés, les résultats et les antécédents. Nous présentons un cadre général mettant en évidence les processus et les caractéristiques uniques de la CSP pour les entreprises multinationales. Dans le but de faire progresser la recherche, nous décrivons comment de nouvelles perspectives théoriques, telles que l'identité organisationnelle et le choix stratégique, peuvent être combinées à la littérature des affaires internationales en vue d'approfondir la théorisation du thème de recherche. Nous discutons également comment les nouvelles dynamiques mondiales, telles que la géopolitique, la numérisation et l'activisme, peuvent façonner les activités et les stratégies de CSP des multinationales, et comment de futures recherches peuvent aborder ces questions.

Examinamos el artículo galardonado con el Premio JIBS de la Década de 2022 de Ioannou y Serafeim (2012) y revisamos la bibliografía desde 2012 para aclarar la evolución de la investigación sobre la responsabilidad social de las empresas (RSE) y el desempeño social de las empresas (CSP por sus iniciales en inglés) en la empresa multinacional, articulando los temas clave, las conclusiones y los antecedentes. Presentamos un marco general que pone de relieve los rasgos y procesos únicos del desempeño social de las empresas en las empresas multinacionales. Para avanzar en el progreso académico, delineamos cómo las nuevas perspectivas teóricas, como la identidad organizacional y la elección estratégica, pueden combinarse con la literatura de la empresa multinacional para profundizar en la teorización del tema. También discutimos cómo las nuevas dinámicas globales, como la geopolítica, la digitalización y el activismo, pueden dar forma a las estrategias y actividades de desempeño social de las empresas de las empresas multinacionales y cómo la investigación futura puede abordar estas cuestiones.

Examinamos o artigo de Ioannou e Serafeim (2012) vencedor do 2022 JIBS Decade Award e revisamos a literatura desde 2012 para esclarecer desenvolvimentos da pesquisa em responsabilidade social corporativa (CSR) e desempenho social corporativo (CSP) na empresa multinacional, articulando temas-chave, conclusões e antecedentes. Apresentamos um modelo geral que destaca características e processos únicos de CSP para MNEs. Para avançar progresso acadêmico, delineamos como novas perspectivas teóricas, tais como identidade organizacional e escolha estratégica, podem ser combinadas com a literatura de IB para aprofundar a teorização do tópico. Também discutimos como novas dinâmicas globais, como geopolítica, digitalização e ativismo, podem moldar estratégias e atividades de CSP para MNEs e como pesquisas futuras podem abordar essas questões.

Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data.

This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned results matching the original reports together with 55% of tests in different spans of years and 40% of tests in novel geographies. Some original findings were associated with multiple new tests. Reproducibility was the best predictor of generalizability-for the findings that proved directly reproducible, 84% emerged in other available time periods and 57% emerged in other geographies. Overall, only limited empirical evidence emerged for context sensitivity. In a forecasting survey, independent scientists were able to anticipate which effects would find support in tests in new samples.

Mental disorder symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: There is a lack of evidence related to the prevalence of mental health symptoms as well as their heterogeneities during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Latin America, a large area spanning the equator. The current study aims to provide meta-analytical evidence on mental health symptoms during COVID-19 among frontline healthcare workers, general healthcare workers, the general population and university students in Latin America. METHODS: Bibliographical databases, such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO and medRxiv, were systematically searched to identify pertinent studies up to August 13, 2021. Two coders performed the screening using predefined eligibility criteria. Studies were assigned quality scores using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The double data extraction method was used to minimise data entry errors. RESULTS: A total of 62 studies with 196 950 participants in Latin America were identified. The pooled prevalence of anxiety, depression, distress and insomnia was 35%, 35%, 32% and 35%, respectively. There was a higher prevalence of mental health symptoms in South America compared to Central America (36% v. 28%, p < 0.001), in countries speaking Portuguese (40%) v. Spanish (30%). The pooled prevalence of mental health symptoms in the general population, general healthcare workers, frontline healthcare workers and students in Latin America was 37%, 34%, 33% and 45%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The high yet heterogenous level of prevalence of mental health symptoms emphasises the need for appropriate identification of psychological interventions in Latin America.

Meta-analytic evidence of depression and anxiety in Eastern Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: To perform a systematic and meta-analysis on the prevalence rates of mental health symptoms including anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic in the general population in Eastern Europe, as well as three select sub-populations: students, general healthcare workers, and frontline healthcare workers. Data sources: Studies in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and medRxiv up to 6 February 2021. Eligibility criteria and data analysis: Prevalence rates of mental health symptoms in the general population and key sub-populations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Eastern Europe. Data were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence rates of anxiety and depression. Results: The meta-analysis identifies and includes 21 studies and 26 independent samples in Eastern Europe. Poland (n = 4), Serbia (n = 4), Russia (n = 3), and Croatia (n = 3) had the greatest number of studies. To our knowledge, no studies have been conducted in eleven Eastern European countries including Hungary, Slovakia, and Slovenia. The pooled prevalence of anxiety in 18 studies with 22 samples was 30% (95% CI: 24-37%) pooled prevalence of depression in 18 studies with 23 samples was 27% (95% CI: 21-34%). Implications: The cumulative evidence from the meta-analysis reveals high prevalence rates of clinically significant symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic in Eastern Europe. The findings suggest evidence of a potential mental health crisis in Eastern Europe during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Our synthesis also reveals a relative lack of studies in certain Eastern European countries as well as high heterogeneities among the existing studies, calling for more effort to achieve evidence-based mental healthcare in Eastern Europe.

Objetivo: Realizar un metanálisis sistemático sobre las tasas de prevalencia de síntomas de salud mental, incluidos ansiedad y depresión durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en la población general de Europa del Este, así como en tres subpoblaciones seleccionadas: estudiantes, trabajadores sanitarios generales y trabajadores sanitarios de primera línea.Fuentes de datos: Estudios en PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO y medRxiv hasta el 6 de febrero de 2021.Criterios de elegibilidad y análisis de datos: Tasas de prevalencia de síntomas de salud mental en la población general y subpoblaciones claves durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en Europa del Este. Los datos se combinaron mediante un metanálisis de efectos aleatorios para estimar las tasas de prevalencia de ansiedad y depresión.Resultados: El metanálisis identifica e incluye 21 estudios y 26 muestras independientes en Europa del Este. Polonia (n = 4), Serbia (n = 4), Rusia (n = 3) y Croacia (n = 3) tuvieron el mayor número de estudios. Hasta donde sabemos, no se han realizado estudios en once países de Europa del Este, incluidos Hungría, Eslovaquia y Eslovenia. La prevalencia combinada de ansiedad en 18 estudios con 22 muestras fue de 30% (IC del 95%: 24­37%) y la prevalencia combinada de depresión en 18 estudios con 23 muestras fue de 27% (IC del 95%: 21­34%).Implicaciones: La evidencia acumulada del metanálisis revela altas tasas de prevalencia de síntomas clínicamente significativos durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en Europa del Este. Los hallazgos sugieren evidencia de una posible crisis de salud mental en Europa del Este durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en curso. Nuestra síntesis también revela una relativa falta de estudios en ciertos países de Europa del Este, así como una gran heterogeneidad entre los estudios existentes, lo que exige un mayor esfuerzo para lograr una atención de la salud mental basada en la evidencia en Europa del Este.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Symptoms of Anxiety, Depression, and Insomnia in Spain in the COVID-19 Crisis.

BACKGROUND: General population, frontline healthcare workers (HCWs), and adult students in Spain are at risk of anxiety, depression, and insomnia symptoms during the COVID-19 crisis. A meta-analysis of the individual studies on these symptoms would provide systematic evidence to aid policymakers and researchers in focusing on prevalence, risk, and best interventions. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to be the first meta-analysis and systematic review to calculate the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and insomnia symptoms in Spain's adult population (general population, frontline healthcare workers (HCWs), and adult students) during the Covid-19 epidemic. METHOD: Random-effect meta-analysis was used to estimate the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and insomnia. RESULTS: The meta-analysis includes 28 studies with 38 individual samples in Spain. The pooled prevalence of anxiety symptoms in 22 studies comprising a sample population of 82,024 was 20% (95% CI: 15-25%), that of depression symptoms in 22 articles with a total sample comprising 82,890 individuals was 22% (95% CI: 18-28%), and that of insomnia symptoms in three articles with a sample population of 745 was 57% (95% CI: 48-66%. CONCLUSIONS: The accumulative evidence reveals that adults in Spain suffered higher prevalence rates of mental symptoms during the COVID-19 crisis, with a significantly higher rate relative to other countries such as China. Our synthesis also reveals a relative lack of studies on frontline and general HCWs in Spain.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the mental health symptoms during the Covid-19 pandemic in Southeast Asia.

AIMS: The Covid-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on the mental health of the general public and high-risk groups worldwide. Due to its proximity and close links to China, Southeast Asia was one of the first regions to be affected by the outbreak. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the prevalence of anxiety, depression and insomnia in the general adult population and healthcare workers (HCWs) in Southeast Asia during the course of the first year of the pandemic. METHODS: Several literature databases were systemically searched for articles published up to February 2021 and two reviewers independently evaluated all relevant studies using pre-determined criteria. The prevalence rates of mental health symptoms were calculated using a random-effect meta-analysis model. RESULTS: In total, 32 samples from 25 studies with 20 352 participants were included. Anxiety was assessed in all 25 studies and depression in 15 studies with pooled prevalence rates of 22% and 16%, respectively. Only two studies assessed insomnia, which was estimated at 19%. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was similar among frontline HCWs (18%), general HCWs (17%), and students (20%) while being noticeably higher in the general population (27%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review to investigate the mental health impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in Southeast Asia. A considerable proportion of the general population and HCWs reported mild to moderate symptoms of anxiety and depression; the pooled prevalence rater, however, remain significantly lower than those reported in other areas such as China and Europe.

Consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studies.

Any large dataset can be analyzed in a number of ways, and it is possible that the use of different analysis strategies will lead to different results and conclusions. One way to assess whether the results obtained depend on the analysis strategy chosen is to employ multiple analysts and leave each of them free to follow their own approach. Here, we present consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting such multi-analyst studies, and we discuss how broader adoption of the multi-analyst approach has the potential to strengthen the robustness of results and conclusions obtained from analyses of datasets in basic and applied research.

Mental Health during the COVID-19 Crisis in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

We aim to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence rates of mental health symptoms among major African populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. We include articles from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and medRxiv between 1 February 2020 and 6 February 2021, and pooled data using random-effects meta-analyses. We identify 28 studies and 32 independent samples from 12 African countries with a total of 15,071 participants. The pooled prevalence of anxiety was 37% in 27 studies, of depression was 45% in 24 studies, and of insomnia was 28% in 9 studies. The pooled prevalence rates of anxiety, depression, and insomnia in North Africa (44%, 55%, and 31%, respectively) are higher than those in Sub-Saharan Africa (31%, 30%, and 24%, respectively). We find (a) a scarcity of studies in several African countries with a high number of COVID-19 cases; (b) high heterogeneity among the studies; (c) the extent and pattern of prevalence of mental health symptoms in Africa is high and differs from elsewhere-more African adults suffer from depression rather than anxiety and insomnia during COVID 19 compared to adult populations in other countries/regions. Hence, our findings carry crucial implications and impact future research to enable evidence-based medicine in Africa.